[ad_1]
\n<\/p>\n
Hatay’da 6 \u015eubat’taki depremlerde y\u0131k\u0131lan binalarla ilgili ilk dava, 53 ki\u015finin hayat\u0131n\u0131 kaybetti\u011fi 9 katl\u0131 \u0130lke Apartman\u0131’n\u0131n y\u0131k\u0131lmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin tutuklanan 5 san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131.<\/p>\n
Kahramanmara\u015f merkezli afette y\u0131k\u0131lan merkez Antakya il\u00e7esi G\u00fczelbur\u00e7 Mahallesi’ndeki \u0130lke Apartman\u0131’n\u0131n m\u00fcteahhidi Nas\u0131r Onur E, yap\u0131 denetim sorumlusu \u015eahap H, proje ve uygulama denet\u00e7isi Cemal T, uygulama denet\u00e7isi Volkan B. ve kontrol eleman\u0131 Gussan Z. hakk\u0131nda Hatay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 b\u00fcnyesinde kurulan Deprem Soru\u015fturma B\u00fcrosunca y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturma tamamland\u0131.<\/p>\n
San\u0131klar\u0131n “bilin\u00e7li taksirle birden fazla ki\u015finin \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcne neden olma” su\u00e7undan 22 y\u0131l 6’\u015far aya kadar hapisle cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 talep edilen iddianame, Hatay 4. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesince kabul edildi.<\/p>\n
\u0130ddianamede, 2011’de yap\u0131m\u0131na ba\u015flanan 9 katl\u0131 apartman\u0131n birinci derece deprem ku\u015fa\u011f\u0131nda bulundu\u011fu belirtildi.<\/p>\n
San\u0131klar\u0131n, savunmalar\u0131nda birbirlerini su\u00e7lad\u0131klar\u0131 ve zeminin k\u00f6t\u00fc olmas\u0131 nedeniyle binan\u0131n y\u0131k\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6ne s\u00fcrd\u00fckleri ifade edilen iddianamede, \u015funlar kaydedildi:<\/p>\n
“\u0130ddianameye eklenen bilirki\u015fi raporunda ve soru\u015fturma dosyas\u0131nda mevcut bulunan depremden sonras\u0131na ait foto\u011fraf ve videolar\u0131n inceleme tutana\u011f\u0131nda, \u0130lke Apartman\u0131’n\u0131n \u00e7evresinde bulunan binalar\u0131n y\u0131k\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, bu nedenle \u015f\u00fcphelilerin su\u00e7tan kurtulmaya y\u00f6nelik savunmalar\u0131na dayanak olu\u015fturduklar\u0131, ‘binan\u0131n bulundu\u011fu yerdeki zeminin k\u00f6t\u00fc oldu\u011fu’ iddias\u0131n\u0131n kabul edilebilir nitelikte olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirildi.”<\/p>\n
\u0130ddianamede yer verilen bilirki\u015fi raporunda da yap\u0131n\u0131n in\u015fa a\u015famas\u0131nda zemin et\u00fct ve statik hesap raporlar\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ifade edildi.<\/p>\n
Yap\u0131ya ili\u015fkin analizlere de\u011finilen iddianamede, “Bilirki\u015fi heyetince yap\u0131lan inceleme, de\u011ferlendirme ve elde edilen di\u011fer bulgular neticesinde s\u00f6z konusu binada projelendirme, yap\u0131m ve i\u015f bitimi a\u015famalar\u0131nda Deprem B\u00f6lgelerinde Yap\u0131lacak Binalar Hakk\u0131nda Y\u00f6netmelik (2007) esaslar\u0131na yeterince uyulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tespit edilmi\u015ftir.” denildi.<\/p>\n
Binada do\u011fal gaz s\u0131k\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 nedeniyle \u00e7\u0131kan yang\u0131nda 11 ki\u015finin cenazelerine ula\u015f\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin m\u00fc\u015fteki beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n eklendi\u011fi iddianamede, san\u0131klar\u0131n binan\u0131n in\u015fas\u0131n\u0131 dikkat ve \u00f6zen y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ayk\u0131r\u0131 davranarak ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fi, bu nedenle asli kusurlu say\u0131ld\u0131klar\u0131 belirtildi.<\/p>\n
\u00d6te yandan, G\u00fczelbur\u00e7 Mahallesi’nin binan\u0131n yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 d\u00f6nemde belde olmas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 binaya yap\u0131 kullan\u0131m ve imar izni veren belediye ba\u015fkan\u0131 ile imar m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fc hakk\u0131nda da soru\u015fturma i\u015flemlerine ba\u015fland\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00f6\u011frenildi.<\/p>\n
\u0130lke Apartman\u0131 ile ilgili dava, depremlerin ard\u0131ndan Hatay’da a\u00e7\u0131lan ilk dava olma \u00f6zelli\u011fi ta\u015f\u0131yor.<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n